Architecture is hard to understand. Noble minds and smart people have advanced its debate in spite of their abilities. The observations, notices, and insights recorded here are to help the rest of us understand what's going on. Sometimes its a lot of hype, other times its pretty inspiring.
Saturday, December 03, 2005
Cool Tour of Koolhaas's Casa da Musica
360portugal.com has recently posted some great 360 Panoramas of Rem Koolhaas's recently completed Casa da Musica in Portugal. (Link at the bottom of the 360portugal page.) DYWSC? is preparing for a big post on Rem, so to get in the zen, here are interesting segments from two articles on the Casa da Musica, a building that admittedly is a bit of a mystery...
What's most striking about Casa da Musica is that Koolhaas cites from his own work. Spatially it contains traces of the Netherlands Dance Theatre in The Hague and the Grand Expo in Lille; the tunnel idea and the resulting organisation are more intelligent versions of the Kunsthal in Rotterdam; and the total concept is nothing but an attractive 'excavation exquis'. But one can nonetheless question this 'Koolhaasination', which could be seen as evidence of extreme opportunism without any clear ideology. The architecture and ideas of Rem Koolhaas still influence current discussion and practice, and rightly so, but they are only interpreted when they hit the earth. Perhaps it's time to uncover the universe from where this meteorite comes, since only a critical and intelligent approach towards it can save us from the prevailing onslaught of 'no context, no ideology' urban spacejunk. Ground control to…
... I can see every reason to hate the Casa da Musica. It is swaggeringly egotistical. Its very shape wants to topple over, requiring below-ground structural heroics to keep it upright. It is daft. It is also wonderful. To understand it, you must experience it. Then you will be glad, because what you will experience is the pure rush of raw, cask-strength architecture, undiluted, at its best.
All comments, ideas, and insights presented on this site are the product of the authors – unless otherwise noted. (Lets face it, we quote a lot of people here.) Visitors are welcomed to quote reasonable excerpts on other blogs, with same respect for authorship as used here.
Any images used on DYWSC? are taken from the web and believed to be in the public domain. DYWSC? makes every effort to retain proper citation of photographers, painters, or graphic artists as found. If any images posted here are in violation of copyright law, please contact us and we will remove the offending images immediately upon receipt of proof of breach of copyright.
DYWSC? makes a concerted effort to present facts as accurately as possible and to present any commentary as clearly distinguishable from any factual reporting.
DYWSC? does not claim responsibility for the comments posted on its site. The editors of this blog reserve the right to delete any comment we judge offensive, inappropriate or egregiously off topic.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home