Architecture is hard to understand. Noble minds and smart people have advanced its debate in spite of their abilities. The observations, notices, and insights recorded here are to help the rest of us understand what's going on. Sometimes its a lot of hype, other times its pretty inspiring.
Tuesday, December 13, 2005
Interface in the Plastic Age
Cory Doctorow is co-editor of Boing Boing, and a week ago wrote this piece for the New York Times Circuts Section. The first two paragraphs are interesting for their architectural undertones, but the whole piece lends perspective on current advancements in democratic technology. From the article...
PLASTIC created the age of whimsical forms. Suddenly a radio could look like a moo cow. A chair could look like an egg. Toy ray guns could bulge and swoop. The exuberant designers of the golden age of plastic explored all the wacky, nonfunctional, decorative shapes that household objects could take.
Now that same plasticity is coming to microcontrollers, the computer chips that act as brains for the chirping, dancing, listening and seeing devices that line our knickknack shelves and dashboards and fill our pockets. The proliferation of cheap and cheerful programmable chips promises a new age of "whimsical logic," chips that power devices whose functions are as delightfully impractical as their forms, the sort of thing you find in a stocking but keep on your desk forever.
I read an article a few years back that claimed that plastic was the second truely modern material. It stated that the first modern movement was ushered in with concrete, and a second modern movemnt could be traced with the use of plastic. I think it had a theory about the lack of an implied form with plastic... that it runs counter to Ruskin or the Arts and Craft movement, and that detachment of material and meaning signals the worst threat to architecture in 1000 years.
All comments, ideas, and insights presented on this site are the product of the authors – unless otherwise noted. (Lets face it, we quote a lot of people here.) Visitors are welcomed to quote reasonable excerpts on other blogs, with same respect for authorship as used here.
Any images used on DYWSC? are taken from the web and believed to be in the public domain. DYWSC? makes every effort to retain proper citation of photographers, painters, or graphic artists as found. If any images posted here are in violation of copyright law, please contact us and we will remove the offending images immediately upon receipt of proof of breach of copyright.
DYWSC? makes a concerted effort to present facts as accurately as possible and to present any commentary as clearly distinguishable from any factual reporting.
DYWSC? does not claim responsibility for the comments posted on its site. The editors of this blog reserve the right to delete any comment we judge offensive, inappropriate or egregiously off topic.
1 Comments:
I read an article a few years back that claimed that plastic was the second truely modern material. It stated that the first modern movement was ushered in with concrete, and a second modern movemnt could be traced with the use of plastic. I think it had a theory about the lack of an implied form with plastic... that it runs counter to Ruskin or the Arts and Craft movement, and that detachment of material and meaning signals the worst threat to architecture in 1000 years.
Post a Comment
<< Home