Architecture is hard to understand. Noble minds and smart people have advanced its debate in spite of their abilities. The observations, notices, and insights recorded here are to help the rest of us understand what's going on. Sometimes its a lot of hype, other times its pretty inspiring.
Tuesday, January 31, 2006
Nancy Levinson - Blogger on Fire
Last week over at the Arts Journal, Nancy Levinson wrote a humbling piece on the current state of architectural criticism. She riffed on November’s Architect’s Newspaper, several Big newspaper critics’ “Year in Review” articles, and many other sources. It proves worth the read for a sober appraisal of the several unexpected focal points. There is an interesting thesis tying the decline of the newspaper critic’s power to the slipping away of their sharply corralled audience, and a warning that new critics inherit a new unimaginable, unmanagable landscape of subjects. She compellingly presented the problems facing today’s critics, the rise of the starchitect, and also convincingly traced many of these developements to the new influence of the world wide web. From her post…
“The outlines of a multi-media, print-and-web architecture culture are still emerging, but it's not too soon to discern one of the big challenges for criticism: the Web has made the culture unprecedentedly—amazingly and impossibly—global. Architecture has been international in outlook for years, but until lately this was mainly a matter of keeping up with the foreign journals and new monographs, attending lectures and exhibits, (sometimes even) traveling. Today this manageable world-view has exploded into a superabundance of instant-access globalism at once exhilarating and exhausting. It's not that more architecture is being made around the world, it's that we are more aware of the architecture being made around the world.”
good link - i also have been thinking a lot lately about the (weak) state of contemporary criticism. although "criticism" is a subset of the larger project of "criticality" in architecture, i certainly think that its decline is symptomatic of a broader reaction against any critical function for the discipline. so the question is: what do we do now? maybe there's a way to take Levinson's "superabundance of instant-access globalism" and turn it around to our advantage? maybe that's just what we're trying to do??
just posted some thoughts (yet no real answers) here...
I regret not mentioning her contribution to Perspecta 37. I just flipped through an advanced copy and noted her article. It covers many overlapping issues, and may warrent its own post here.
All comments, ideas, and insights presented on this site are the product of the authors – unless otherwise noted. (Lets face it, we quote a lot of people here.) Visitors are welcomed to quote reasonable excerpts on other blogs, with same respect for authorship as used here.
Any images used on DYWSC? are taken from the web and believed to be in the public domain. DYWSC? makes every effort to retain proper citation of photographers, painters, or graphic artists as found. If any images posted here are in violation of copyright law, please contact us and we will remove the offending images immediately upon receipt of proof of breach of copyright.
DYWSC? makes a concerted effort to present facts as accurately as possible and to present any commentary as clearly distinguishable from any factual reporting.
DYWSC? does not claim responsibility for the comments posted on its site. The editors of this blog reserve the right to delete any comment we judge offensive, inappropriate or egregiously off topic.
2 Comments:
good link - i also have been thinking a lot lately about the (weak) state of contemporary criticism. although "criticism" is a subset of the larger project of "criticality" in architecture, i certainly think that its decline is symptomatic of a broader reaction against any critical function for the discipline. so the question is: what do we do now? maybe there's a way to take Levinson's "superabundance of instant-access globalism" and turn it around to our advantage? maybe that's just what we're trying to do??
just posted some thoughts (yet no real answers) here...
I regret not mentioning her contribution to Perspecta 37. I just flipped through an advanced copy and noted her article. It covers many overlapping issues, and may warrent its own post here.
Post a Comment
<< Home